The Preamble of the NCHER Bill says it is an “Act to promote the autonomy of higher education institutions for the free pursuit of knowledge and innovation, and for facilitating access, inclusion and opportunities to all… and to provide for an advisory mechanism of eminent peers in academia.” One would expect critics to give reasoned arguments on how the provisions of the Bill contradict these objectives, or in what manner it could be better achieved.

FOR FULL TEXT:

FOR FURTHER READING:

DRAFT NCHER Bill 2010 – Academia, Legislatures Need Not Think but Follow New Commission’s Dictates – Vijender Sharma